Book description
Did mankind evolve unusually large brains simply in order to
gossip? Primates differ from other animals by the intensity of their
social relationships, by the amount of time they spend grooming one
another. Not just a matter of hygiene, grooming is all about cementing
bonds, making friends and influencing your fellow ape. Early humans,
in their characteristic large groups of 150 or so, would have had to
spend almost half their time in mutual grooming. Instead, Professor
Robin Dunbar argues, they evolved a more efficient mechanism:
language. It seems there is nothing idle about idle chatter. Having a
good gossip ensures that a dynamic group - of hunter-gatherers,
soldiers, workmates - remains cohesive. Men and women 'gossip'
equally, but men tend to talk about themselves, while women talk more
about other people, working to strengthen the female-female
relationships that underpin both human and primate societies. Until
now, most anthropologists have assumed that language developed in
male-male relationships, during activities such as hunting. Dunbar's
intriguing research suggests that, to the contrary, language evolved
among women.
Robin Dunbar is currently Professor of Evolutionary Anthropology at
Oxford University and a Fellow of Magdalen College. His principal
research interest is the evolution of sociality. He was elected a Fellow
of the British Academy in 1998. His books include The Trouble with
Science, 'an eloquent riposte to the anti-science lobby' (Sunday Times),
and Grooming, Gossip and the Evolution of Language. The Human Story was
described as 'fizzing with recent research and new theories' in the
Sunday Times and 'punchy and provocative' by the New Scientist. How Many
Friends Does One Person Need?: Dunbar's Number and Other Evolutionary
Quirks was published in 2010.